คาสิโน ออนไลน์ pantip

"Let's build your own Dreams Together"

คาสิโน ออนไลน์ pantip
Colonial Downs Proposes Casino Resort in Dumfries
By admin | | 0 Comments |

Rosie’s Gaming Emporium opened doors on January 8. It is a 19,000-square-foot gaming center with 95 video slots, located in the Triangle Shopping Center in Dumfries. Colonial Downs, the property’s owner, now proposes another building, which is a massive $389 million casino resort on the grounds of Potomac Landfill, a debris junkyard on the edge of town. The future facility would be called “The Rose” and would be the first in Virginia with this size, providing such gaming options. According to the plan for “The Rose”, the facility will consist of 50,000 square feet of gaming space, a 250-seat sports bar, as well as other bars and restaurants, 200 hotel rooms, a theater with 1,500 seats and 7,000 square feet of meeting space. Colonial Downs, which owns Rosie’s and operates a racetrack in New Kent County near Richmond, as well as four other Rosie’s emporiums across the state, will pitch its idea today during a 7 a.m. Dumfries Town Council meeting. The new facility is hoped to bring a lot of profit to the town. It is expected to create 640 jobs that pay $15 an hour wage. 96 managers will be hired to work at The Rose and they will make an average of $70,000 a year. According to Colonial Downs, the new casino would generate $11.3 million a year in new tax revenue for Prince William County and nearly $80,000 a year for Dumfries. If the pitch is accepted, construction of the new casino will start in August this year, which means that Potomac Landfill will be closed 11 years earlier than planned. The casino will take 22 acres of the property with 79 acres remaining that will be converted into a park with sports fields, trails and open space. The town documents stated that the park would open in December 2022 and the casino would open only a month later. This is if everything goes according to plan. The Potomac Landfill The town agreed with the landfill in 2016 to close the facility. The closing date was set for 2032. At that time, the town planned on turning the site into a public park. The problem for the landfill started in 2011 when the neighbors and drivers on the Interstate 95 complained of sulfur smell. It was permeated the surrounding area so the facility needed to shut down. Rosie’s Gaming Emporium is the first gaming facility to open its doors in Northern Virginia. Since its opening, more than 21,000 people have visited the gaming parlor in the shopping center. The property has donated more than $75,000 to charity since it started operating and has created 100 jobs for the locals. Its establishment was made possible by the legalization of gambling in Dumfries in November 2019. A citywide referendum passed with more than 60% of the vote, following an extensive advertising campaign by Colonial Downs. Source: “Resort casino proposed to open in Dumfries in January 2023”, Potomac Local, January 15, 2021
หวยออนไลน์ เล่นหวยออนไลน์ ไพ่ออนไลน์ เว็บ คาสิโน คาสิโน777
BGC ices gambling talk on football social media sites
By admin | | 0 Comments |

The UK Betting and Gaming Council (BGC) is asking football clubs to refrain from discussing and promoting gambling on their social media sites in as part of an effort to avoid triggering problem gamblers. It’s move that may seem extreme to the layman, but will likely help keep UK gambling operators a step ahead of UK gambling regulators. Guidelines for how football clubs should handle discussions of gambling were sent out by the BGC late last week and utilize a plea from 50 former gambling addicts to make the case. They pointed out that seeing their favorite club site promoting gambling caused them “distress” and “encouraged” them to place wagers. As an effort to avoid these triggering moments, the BGC is recommending that football clubs refrain from promoting gambling operators or bonus offers and their “organic tweets”. This is a nod to the reality that gambling offers are ubiquitous on social media and that no one is really more than a click or two away from them on the internet anyways. BGC officials sent a letter detailing the new code of conduct to 11 football clubs, as well as to social media operators. In a statement reported on by SBC News, Brigid Simmonds OBE, Chairman of the BGC described the importance of the new standards saying, “Our members rightly have a zero tolerance approach to gambling by under-18s, so as an industry we are understandably concerned that children may be exposed to betting adverts on social media platforms. Our new guidelines make clear the standards expected of football clubs when they post gambling promotions on social media, and I look forward to them being put into practice as soon as possible.” The BGC guidelines are not legally binding, but members of the BGC who wish to remain in good standing are expected to abide by them. The post BGC ices gambling talk on football social media sites appeared first on .
คาสิโน77 saคาสิโน รอยัล คาสิโน คาสิโน 777 คาสิโน 888
Australia v India cricket betting: Tips for the second Test
By admin | | 0 Comments |

Here are four cricket betting tips that Adam Drury thinks you should consider for the second Test between Australia and India, starting at the MCG on Boxing Day. India to win This should be treated with caution, but 4/1 is just an enormous price for a team of India’s class to win a single Test match. They won a series down under just two years ago, and still have match-winners Che Pujara, Jasprit Bumrah, Ravi Ashwin and others available to them. As their 36 all out in the first Test proved, getting through the new ball is vital for their chances, so replacing Prithvi Shaw with Shubman Gill at the top of the order should give them a better chance here. Marnus Labuschagne to score over 33.5 first-innings runs Labuschagne’s first innings record is absolutely phenomenal. He has passed this mark in the first innings of all nine Test matches that he has played since breaking into the team during the 2019 Ashes, with four centuries and a lowest score of 47. Josh Hazlewood to be Australia’s leading first-innings wicket-taker Hazlewood blew India away with figures of 5/8 in the second innings of the first Test. As the outsider of Australia’s three pace options, but by no means worse than the others, he is the natural pick here. Che Pujara to be India’s leading first-innings run-scorer In the absence of Virat Kohli, Pujara is India’s best batsman. He chiselled out 43 in the first innings of the first Test, only losing to Kohli in this market, and hit centuries in the first innings of three of India’s four Tests in Australia two years ago. Visit Betway's cricket betting page.
สมัคร คาสิโน ออนไลน์ ดาฟาเบท คาสิโน มือถือ คาสิโน ฝาก ถอนไม่มีขั้นต่ำ คาสิโน เครดิตฟรี คาสิโน ฟรีเครดิต
Super Bowl Streaker Bet $50,000 on Himself but Bovada Won’t Pay Out
By admin | | 0 Comments |

09:1116 FebOnline sportsbook Bovada likely won’t be paying out the largest supposedly winning wager on whether a streaker would disrupt the Super Bowl LV game between the Kansas City Chiefs and Tampa Bay Buccaneers after the site discovered the streaker was part of a group having placed a large bet on such an event occurring during the game.Yuri Andrade, the 31-year-old Florida man who briefly disrupted the game with his run in a pink leotard and black shorts, announced in an apperance on a Florida radio station Wild 94.1 talk show that he was part of a group that had bet $50,000 that a streaker would appear. Andrade told the show’s audience that his group had locked in the bet at +750, resulting in the high would-be payout.However, Bovada, a grey-market betting site offering services to many US states, quickly learned of Andrade’s admission. The site had already been aware of “suspicious activity” on the prop line, likely the overly large $50,000 wager. As a result, Bovada has already announced it will refund the wagers of all “no” bettors, while also screening for legitimacy all “yes” wagers made before officially grading them.The episode will likely do no publicity favors for Bovada, however, despite the site’s willingness to take a moderate financial hit. Bovada’s lines appear prominently throughout the US’s sports-betting world, on broadcasts and in live and online publications, and as a consequence the site remains under considerable pressure from the US’s growing licensed and regulated markets. At the very least, the event is likely to make Bovada reconsider offering prop bets of this nature, ones that have the potential to disrupt larger sporting events.“Our players have always trusted us to ensure the integrity of all props offered in our sportsbook,”Bovada stated. “We will continue to make sure that any publicity stunts or ill-intended behavior cannot adversely affect the outcome of a player’s wager.”It’s not the first time that streaking has figured into an online gambling story. Nearly 20 years ago, online casino site GoldenPalace.com garnered publicity by investing in all sorts of bizarre activities, including sponsoring serial streaker Mark Roberts’ dashes at events including Super Bowl XXXVIII in 2004. Roberts sported a temporary GoldenPalace.com tattoo during his runs, which were just a small part of the site’s bizarre guerilla marketing campaigns.Did you like this article?Tweet +0
สมัคร คาสิโน ออนไลน์ ดาฟาเบท คาสิโน มือถือ คาสิโน ฝาก ถอนไม่มีขั้นต่ำ คาสิโน เครดิตฟรี คาสิโน ฟรีเครดิต
House OKs Angelo Kouame, Bienvenido Marañon naturalization
By admin | | 0 Comments |

Bienve Maranon and Angelo Kouame near naturalization. FILE PHOTOS MANILA, Philippines — Athletes Angelo Kouame and Bienvenido Marañon’s naturalization bids have hurdled the House of Representatives, bringing them another step closer to gaining Filipino citizenship. During its Tuesday session, the lower chamber approved on third and final reading House Bill No. 8632 and 8631 which grants Filipino citizenship to Ateneo Blue Eagles’ Ivorian basketball star Kouame and United City FC’s Spanish football striker Marañon, respectively. Naturalization is a step required for the athletes to compete under the Philippine flag. Once a naturalization bid hurdles the House, it will be passed to the Senate before its submission to the Office of the President. Kouame was included in the 16-man lineup of Gilas Pilipinas for the FIBA Asia Cup 2021 qualifiers in Manama, Bahrain, but was not able to suit up due to his pending naturalization. The center from Ateneo was named UAAP Rookie of the Year in 2018. During the hearing of the House committee on justice back in December 2020, Samahang Basketbol ng Pilipinas (SBP) President Al Panlilio said that the Philippines eyes to progress in the international basketball ranking by excelling in different tournaments. “Almost every team has a naturalized player especially in our region because the Europeans are very big,” Panlilio said. “We are hoping with Ange here–He’s been here for four years. And I think it is an investment for the national team program of the SBP with Ange to be with us maybe for the next 10 to 15 years,” he added. Meanwhile, Manila Rep. Manuel Luis Lopez, who filed the bill for Maranon’s citizenship, said that Marañon “has shown exceptional skills complemented by commendable work ethics.” “He is known as one of the most prolific scorers in Southeast Asia,” Lopez said. “If granted the opportunity to play for the Philippines, Maranon will undoubtedly be an invaluable asset to the national football team, the Azkals, and bring pride and honor to our country,” he added. Read Next Don't miss out on the latest news and information. Subscribe to INQUIRER PLUS to get access to The Philippine Daily Inquirer & other 70+ titles, share up to 5 gadgets, listen to the news, download as early as 4am & share articles on social media. Call 896 6000. For feedback, complaints, or inquiries, contact us.
ปอยเปต คาสิโน ออนไลน์ dgคาสิโน ปอยเปต คาสิโน ออนไลน์ คาสิโนsa คาสิโน sa
My Confession: Male, Age 21 (AUSTRALIA)
By admin | | 0 Comments |

ก่อนอื่นให้ข้อมูลพื้นฐานที่สำคัญแก่คุณก่อน: ฉันอาศัยอยู่ที่บ้านกับพ่อและแฟนของฉัน (เขาอยู่ระหว่างบ้าน) พวกเขาทั้งสองเป็นเพื่อนที่ดีที่สุดของฉัน ฉันกำลังมีอาการปวดเรื้อรังที่เกิดขึ้นที่ข้อมือและแขนตั้งแต่เดือนกรกฎาคม 2020 เข้าและออกจากการนัดหมาย / ตรวจทุกสองสัปดาห์ ฉันไม่สามารถทำอะไรได้มากในแต่ละวันการทำสิ่งปกติในแต่ละวันเป็นเรื่องที่เจ็บปวด - ดังนั้นฉันจึงไม่สามารถทำงานหรือเรียนได้อีกต่อไป ยาแก้ปวดไม่ช่วย วันพฤหัสบดีเป็นวันที่ฉันสูญเสียเงินออมทั้งชีวิตจริงๆ ตั้งแต่นั้นมาฉันใช้เงินทุกบาทที่หามาได้เพื่อชดเชยการสูญเสียนี้และฉันแน่ใจว่าคุณรู้ว่าตอนนี้ฉันอยู่ที่ไหน หนี้ $ 8 และตกงานโดยไม่มีรายได้ แต่ฉันมาที่นี่ได้อย่างไร? ฉันติดการพนันเมื่อตอนอายุ 17/18 ตอนนั้นฉันเสียเงินทั้งหมด แต่น้อยกว่า $ 1,000 (มี แต่พ่อของฉันเท่านั้นที่รู้) ตั้งแต่นั้นมาฉันสาบานว่าจะไม่เล่นการพนันอีกและฉันจะไม่สามารถเล่นได้นานถึง 2 สัปดาห์ พ่อและฉันกำลังดูคริกเก็ตและเขาใส่เงินจำนวน $ 100 (เขาไม่ค่อยเล่นการพนัน) และได้รับรางวัล 450 ดอลลาร์เราทั้งคู่คิดว่ามันยอดเยี่ยมมากดังนั้นฉันจึงให้ตัวเองที่ 50 ดอลลาร์สำหรับเกมถัดไป ฉันจบลงด้วยการสูญเสีย $ 25 และชนะมันกลับไปเป็นปาเป้าในภายหลัง ฉันตัดสินใจที่จะหยุดทำงานเพราะแฟนอายุ 2 ปี (คู่หมั้นของฉัน) ไม่เห็นด้วยกับการเล่นการพนันอีกต่อไป ฉันจึงหยุด - จนกระทั่งพ่อของฉันชักชวนให้ฉันโกหกและเล่นการพนันข้างหลังเขา นี่คือการสูญเสียที่ไร้เดียงสา $ 5- $ 10 ที่นี่และที่นั่นในอีก 2 สัปดาห์ข้างหน้า จนกระทั่งสัปดาห์ที่แล้วหนึ่งวันหลังจากวันเกิดของแฟนฉันทุกอย่างก็เงียบลง เขาต้องทำงานพ. & พฤทิ้งให้ฉันอยู่คนเดียว 2 วัน ฉันเสียใจมากที่ทิ้งขยะและฉันรู้สึกว่าฉันมีเงินทั้งหมดและไม่ได้ใช้มัน (ซึ่งเป็นสิ่งที่โง่ที่สุดที่ฉันรู้ฉันรู้) ดังนั้นฉันจึงเริ่มเล่นการพนันในการแข่งขัน ด้วยเงินเดิมพันสูง 1,000 ดอลลาร์และใช้เวลาเป็นชั่วโมงรับรายได้ 10,000 ดอลลาร์จากนั้นลดลงเหลือ 5,000 ดอลลาร์ก่อนที่ฉันจะเดิมพันทั้งธนาคารเพื่อกลับไปยังจุดเริ่มต้นที่ 15k ดอลลาร์ ฉันหยุดเดินเข้าไปในห้องและตระหนักว่าฉันทำอะไรไปฉันเกือบจะสูญเสียธนาคารทั้งหมด ฉันหยุดอยู่แค่นั้นเหรอ? ไม่คุณเดาได้ ในที่สุดสิ่งหนึ่งก็นำไปสู่อีกสิ่งหนึ่งและตอนนี้ฉันมีหนี้ $ 15,000 และหนี้ $ 9 ฉันสารภาพทุกอย่างกับแฟนและพ่อของฉันในวันพฤหัสบดี ว่าพวกเขาทั้งสองได้รับการสนับสนุนอย่างเท่าเทียมกัน ตอนนั้นฉันมีเงิน 2,000 เหรียญในธนาคารและบอกว่าฉันลาออกแล้ว แต่ฉันทำไม่ได้ฉันจ่าย 1,500 ดอลลาร์เมื่อวานและ 500 ดอลลาร์ในวันนี้ ใช่สำหรับเงินกู้ 9 เหรียญ แม้ว่าฉันจะไม่ได้ติดยาเสพติด (แปลกที่ฉันศึกษาจิตวิทยามา 2 ปีก่อนที่ฉันจะได้รับการวินิจฉัยว่าเป็นโรคเรื้อรังนี้) แต่ฉันก็ตกอยู่ในกับดักของการพนันอีกครั้งและเสี่ยงที่จะเสียเงิน 2,000 ดอลลาร์สุดท้ายเพื่อไม่ให้ได้เงิน แต่ฉันกลับมองว่ามันเป็น เป็นช่องทางหาเงินเพื่อที่ฉันจะได้ให้แฟนกับฉันในอนาคต แต่มันเป็นความคิดที่ไม่ดีที่จะเข้าหาทุกคน เงินกู้ $ 9 ฉันหยุดที่นี่ ฉันสัญญาที่นี่ตอนนี้ ฉันไม่ได้บอกแฟนหรือพ่อของฉันเกี่ยวกับเงิน 2,000 เหรียญที่ผ่านมา แต่ฉันคิดว่าฉันจะอยู่กับสิ่งนี้ในตอนนี้เพราะฉันจะได้มันกลับคืนมาโดยการขายรายได้ที่เก็บสะสมไว้ในช่วงหลายปีที่ผ่านมา ขอบคุณพระเจ้าสำหรับสิ่งนั้น นอกจากนี้ฉันสามารถรับเงินบำนาญสำหรับเงื่อนไขของฉันดังนั้นหากได้รับการอนุมัติเงินของฉันควรถูกล็อค ฉันต้องเอามันออกไปให้หมดและมันทำให้ฉันเจ็บปวดทางร่างกายอย่างมากที่ต้องเขียนมันลงไปเพราะอาการป่วยเรื้อรัง ฉันไม่คาดหวังว่าจะมีใครอ่านทั้งหมดเพราะมันมีไว้สำหรับฉัน ขอบคุณ. C. ส่งโดย / u / codefrost [comments]
เกม คาสิโน ได้เงินจริง เกม คาสิโน ออนไลน์ คาสิโน ใหม่ ล่าสุด คาสิโน ออนไลน์ สล็อต เฮง เฮง คาสิโน
Addabbo Confident New York Mobile Sports Betting Can Launch This Year
By admin | | 0 Comments |

Posted on: February 15, 2021, 10:16h.  Last updated on: February 15, 2021, 10:32h. Steve Bittenbender Read MoreNew York state Sen. Joseph Addabbo, Jr. (D-Queens), the lawmaker spearheading the push for the Empire State to embrace mobile sports betting, doesn’t just believe the state legislature will pass a bill soon to expand sports betting in the state. New York state Sen. Joseph Addabbo Jr. takes part in a swearing-in ceremony for his seventh term last month. Addabbo is a leading lawmaker pushing to legalize mobile sports betting in the state. (Image: NYSenate.gov)He also believes the first bets could take place later this year.“I remain optimistic that should it be in the budget April 1st, with a little initiative, our state government can get it up and running by Sept. 9th, which is the first day of the NFL football season,” Addabbo told Casino.org in an interview.It’s been nearly three years since the US Supreme Court opened the door for sports betting nationwide. New York did take advantage and approve retail licenses for its four upstate casino resorts. In addition, Class III tribal casinos are also allowed to offer sportsbooks on their properties.However, analysts and observers point out that New York misses out on a significant revenue stream since it does not allow mobile applications.For example: According to the New York State Gaming Commission, the four retail sportsbooks in the state generated revenue totaling nearly $3.6 million in January. Over the same month, Indiana – a state with roughly a third of New York’s population – saw its mobile and retail operators earn $29.3 million in taxable revenue.The senator said New York usually leads the way when it comes to state policy.“We’re that car in the right lane with four wobbly wheels, and we’re limping along,” Addabbo said. “And these other fast cars like (New) Jersey and Pennsylvania are whizzing by us. That’s an odd spot for New York to be in.”Sports Betting Part of NY Budget TalksA recent study by Spectrum Gaming estimated that mobile sports betting could generate more than $1 billion in gross revenue for New York operators. If the state sets the tax rate at 10 percent, that would mean more than $100 million in annual revenue.Addabbo’s bill, Senate Bill S1183, as well as legislation sponsored by state Assemblyman Gary Pretlow (D-Mount Vernon), sets the rate an 8.5 percent. However, that rate, like other portions of the bill are open to negotiation, the senator said.The senator also noted that the original sports betting bill he filed a couple of years ago gave each casino one skin. Now, the bill offers them two, which means a potential of 14 skins, or mobile operators, for the state once the three downstate casinos are awarded.I think that’s all part of the budget negotiations,” Addabbo told Casino.org. “How many skins and the license fee and the tax rate that is all part and parcel of the budget negotiations. It’s all part of the discussions that we’re going to have, and that’s where we’ll have to come to some agreement.”Still, time is of the essence.April 1, the start of New York’s budget year, is just 45 days away as of Monday. While that’s six and a half weeks, as Gov. Andrew Cuomo told reporters Monday, “in government, 45 days is a blink of an eye.”Addabbo Concerned State-Run System Can’t Meet DemandThe good news is that Cuomo is on board with expanding sports betting in the state to include online applications. The bad news is, his vision for sports betting varies significantly from that of Addabbo and Pretlow. Those lawmakers chair the gaming committees in the respective chambers.Both lawmakers’ bills call for New York to operate sports betting like New Jersey, Pennsylvania, and Indiana. Each of the state’s casinos currently would get the chance to partner with two mobile operators.Cuomo, though, wants the state to be in more control. He wants a system more like the lottery allowing the state to derive more of the revenue. That approach resembles what Rhode Island, Montana, New Hampshire, Delaware, and Oregon have implemented.As Addabbo indicated, though, those states combined have a smaller population than New York.“I’m concerned about New York having a product that can handle the volume and the growing, expanding the market,” Addabbo told Casino.org.He also noted that Oregon leaders are already having second thoughts about their lottery-managed sports betting product.Just last month, Gov. Kate Brown requested that the state’s legislature take up a bill allowing the Oregon Racing Commission to regulate sports betting and grant licenses.“So, if it’s not good enough for Oregon, I don’t think it should be good enough for New York,” Addabbo said.
คาสิโน888 คาสิโน88 เกม คาสิโน เกมส์ คาสิโน ts911 คาสิโน ออนไลน์
Shifts In Poker Strategy With Ping Liu
By admin | | 0 Comments |

In the nearly two decades since poker experienced a boom thanks to Chris Moneymaker’s historic World Series of Poker main event victory in 2003, the strategy surrounding the game has evolved at a pace never before seen. With online poker, the game’s best players were able to see more hands quickly and develop more complex strategies to win. Bet sizing, aggression levels, and even something as basic as preflop hand selection has changed drastically since the game went mainstream. Chicago native and Southern California resident Ping Liu has been playing long enough to see most of these changes. With his first significant cash as a pro coming back in 2011 and experience playing online before that, Liu emerged as a true force in 2018 as a contender for the World Poker Tour Player of the Year title. Not only did he finish fourth in the Five Diamond World Poker Classic for $599,147, but he also took fourth in the Rolling Thunder main event for another $97,510, and fifth in the bestbet Bounty Scramble for another $73,734. Last year, Liu picked up a win at the LA Poker Classic, while also final tabling the $10,000 super turbo bounty event at the WSOP and finishing third in the WSOP Circuit Planet Hollywood main event. He now has $2.1 million in career tournament earnings, and is currently accepting students for poker coaching and can found on Twitter @PingDotCom. Liu sat down with Card Player to break down a couple hands from the 2007 WPT Borgata Poker Open main event final table, which featured Mike Matusow, Eugene Todd, Mark Weitzman, Haralabos Voulgaris, and eventual winner Roy Winston. The Action: Roy Winston raised to 230,000 on the button and Mark Weitzman called out of the big blind. On the flop, Weitzman led out for 400,000 and Winston raised to 1,400,000. Weitzman folded. Steve Schult: Before we even get into the hand itself, the first thing I noticed is the ante size. The blinds are 40,000-80,000, but the ante is just 5,000, meaning there is 30,000 in the middle in antes at the six-handed final table. Nearly all poker tournaments now use the big blind ante, which would put 80,000 in antes in the middle. So how should the ante size dictate your preflop hand selection? Ping Liu: It’s pretty simple, intuitively, that if there is less dead money in the pot preflop, then you have less to win by raising and trying to steal the blinds. Therefore, you are less incentivized to voluntarily put money in the pot, and because of that, you will be opening slightly tighter ranges. SS: Should it affect how large or small you raise? In this hand, Winston raises on the button to 230,000 and nowadays you would see something between 160,000 and 200,000 in this spot. PL: If there is less money in the middle, your raise size should go down as well. If there is less in the middle, and you’re still raising three times the blind, you’re risking more to win less. So, it’s kind of similar preflop where you can just think of what you’re raising by a percentage of the pot. Let’s say you were in a cash game and the blinds were $1-$2 and you’re raising 2.5 big blinds to $5. That is 62.5% of the pot. And obviously with more dead money in the middle, 60% of the pot gets bigger and bigger effectively. The bigger the antes, the more you should be raising preflop, because you stand to win more if you take the blinds down right away. That being said, back in the day, people really did raise close to 3x as the standard and I’m not really sure why that was. And I think over the years, preflop raise sizes just started getting smaller and smaller all the way down to just a min-raise, which I think started happening around 2014. SS: Winston raises to 230,000 and Mark Weitzman calls out of the big blind. Weitzman started the hand with 1.75 million, or about 23 big blinds. I remember a mantra from this time period with regard to stack sizes which generally said that with around 10 big blinds you should be open-shoving and with about 20, you should find spots to just three-bet shove your stack. Should Weitzman have much of a flatting range? PL: The first thing is that you’re right that 13 years ago, people usually played 20-big blind stacks a lot more like you described. They would just shove over an open. But over the years, [we have realized] there is still a lot more play anywhere between 10- and 20-big blind stacks. You can flat and take your hand post-flop. But that is also a function of what we were talking about before. If someone is min-raising, and you have 20 big blinds in the big blind, you can still defend and have a decent amount of playability. But when people are opening to 3x, and now you have to call two additional big blinds instead of one, it does make a big difference. Once they start tripling the blind, your risk/reward for just shoving becomes a lot better. If they fold pre to your jam, you’re going to win another big blind plus what’s in the middle. I think there has been more play post-flop recently at the shorter stack sizes, but that’s also a function of the raise sizes preflop going down. SS: Weitzman calls and the flop comes jack-high with two clubs. He then donk-bets (betting from out of position into the aggressor) for 400,000. Can you explain the rationale of why you would want to donk-bet? PL: The rationale behind donk-betting is that you connected with that particular flop stronger than your opponent did. You’re saying that you have the range advantage on that board. Usually, if someone is the preflop raiser, you are going to have the strongest hands in your range. You’ll have A-A, K-K, Q-Q, A-K. And if you just flat the raise preflop, then those hands aren’t going to be present in your range because you most likely would’ve put in a three-bet. So very often, the player who defends from the big blind, won’t have a big hand. Because the top of their range isn’t going to be present. There are certain, pretty specific board textures, where the big blind theoretically could have a range advantage, but those are going to be on the lower board textures. Something like 4-5-6 with a flush draw. That’s a board where it is more theoretically optimal to construct a donk-leading range out of the big blind, because you’ll have a lot more of the 4-5’s, the 4-6’s, the 5-6’s, and also more straight combos than the button. The button probably isn’t raising 4-6 offsuit, but from the big blind, you could defend it. In terms of what I actually think he’s doing here, I would guess that he just has a hand that he is looking to go with at this point. He’s just trying to protect it and take the pot down right away. SS: How have you seen the donk-bet strategy change throughout the years? Is there more or less of it now than when you started posting results a decade ago? PL: I do think the amount of donk-betting has gone down over the years quite substantially. Most moderately studied players know that when you defend out of the big blind, the most common play is to check to the preflop raiser and then react accordingly. That’s something that all the solvers have proven. Checking your range is going to be the best play. Back then in the pre-solver era, people didn’t understand how ranges interacted and they just started donking on boards where they shouldn’t have a leading range on it. The main problem with doing that is it turns your hand face up. Let’s say you’re playing with a relatively weak player and they donk on this board and you have nothing, so you just fold. Then the next time you play a hand with them and you get a similar board texture, and now they check. Because you know they have a donking range and they put their strong hands in it, their checking range becomes unprotected. Every time they check, you can just c-bet (continuation bet) everything and expect to get a lot of folds because their range will be significantly weaker. SS: Weitzman had 14 big blinds behind, and there was another player with about 18 big blinds. Is this a good spot for Winston to apply ICM (Independent Chip Model) pressure or does he usually have a hand here? PL: I think he has to have some equity. He can’t just do it with air because I think the big blind is showing a significant amount of strength by donking so big on this board without much behind. He shouldn’t expect him to lead this big and fold. More likely than not, he’s got a strong top pair. The Action: The action folded to Haralbos Voulgaris, who completed the small blind. Weitzman checked his option from the big blind. Both players checked the flop and Voulgaris bet 155,000 on the turn. Weitzman called. Both players checked the river and Weitzman won the pot at showdown. SS: Action folds to Haralabos in the small blind, who completes. Open limping is still somewhat prevalent in today’s game, but what were the types of hands you would generally see people limp with? PL: Open limping is definitely part of a pretty viable preflop strategy, even in 2020. And you’re going to see it a lot more once you get to a sub-20 big blind stack depth. You can have some open limps from the cutoff with like 15 big blinds or so. And the same thing for the button. But specifically, in this spot, blind vs. blind, the optimal strategy does include a lot of limps from the small blind. Especially with an ante in the pot, the small blind is getting such a good immediate price to complete, they really are going to be incentivized to play a lot of their hands. And because their ranges are going to be so wide, often times, the small blind will often play a limp-only strategy and then respond accordingly if the big blind does choose to raise. SS: Weitzman checks his option and the flop is A-K-J with two hearts. Both players check and the 9 comes on the turn. Voulgaris decides to take a pot-sized stab with his deuces. I remember a limp-stab strategy being implemented in these spots. Is this just a delayed limp-stab? PL: With deuces, nowadays, the standard play preflop would be just to shove when the big blind has 20 big blinds and you cover him. The low pocket pairs don’t play particularly well post-flop, especially against the big blind. As played, most players would take a stab right away with deuces on the flop. On an A-K-J board texture, when the big blind checks back, he is going to be really capped and not have any of the strong hands in his range. Those are the hands he would’ve raised or shoved preflop. It’s unlikely that the big blind has an ace in his hand, whereas the small blind can still have some of the stronger hands in his range that was going for a limp-raise. It’s a better board texture for the small blind, so I think the better play would be to stab the flop. Even just for one big blind would be fine. If the big blind has two unders, they aren’t going to continue regardless of what size he chooses. When we get to the turn, he’s probably thinking the same thing. The big blind probably doesn’t have that much, and he’s just going to bet his hand and deny some equity. I think the pot-sizing is not super effective. What he’s trying to get him to do is get him to fold an air hand, win the pot right away, and protect his low pair. But since the pot is slightly more than two big blinds, then all he needs to do is bet the minimum. The big blind will fold something like 7-5 offsuit, or whatever rags he has. And if the big blind does have a pair, he won’t fold regardless of whether Haralabos bet one big blind or full pot. SS: I know you’re speculating here, but do you think Haralabos was planning to limp-shove on Weitzman preflop? PL: I think it should just be a shove every time, so I’m not sure. From the small blind, there is a lot more limping, but the deeper you are, with more antes in the middle, the more you should play a limp-only strategy because you’re going to be playing out of position and deep-stacked. The shorter and shorter you get, the more open raising or open shoving you are going to see. At the 20-big blind stack depth, there is a significant portion of your range that is going to want to open shove preflop, and the most prevalent part of that range is going to be the small pocket pairs and low, offsuit aces that don’t play well post-flop. And even some low suited aces could shove preflop. You could shove some suited connectors for balance. He will have some limping in his range and will have raise-calls in his range and some raise-folds. The shallower you get, the more options you want to have from the small blind. SS: Weitzman actually had Q-J offsuit. Should he be raising? What do you think about his option check preflop? PL: Did you say he was the shortest stack at this point? SS: At this point, he is the second-shortest stack. There was one player at the table who had about seven big blinds. PL: Given that there is a significant amount of ICM consideration because he’s going to get a pretty big pay jump if he just folds and lets the other guy bust, that would make me want to check back his hand a little bit more often. He could just shove over the limp. And if he knows that Haralabos is going to limp something like 2-2, then I really like shoving as well, because you’re probably going to get him to fold some stuff that he shouldn’t. I think his two options are either to check back or shove. I don’t think raising is a good strategy because I think there is a portion of Haralabos’ range that will be limp-shoving, and I think 2-2 would be part of that range. You don’t want to raise something like 3x and then face a shove. SS: Weitzman called the turn bet and both players checked the river. PL: I think the river action is pretty standard at this point, but it just sort of goes back to what I said about the turn. Haralabos didn’t need to bet so big on the turn because he would’ve accomplished what he was trying to with a one big blind bet. When he does bet turn and check river, it does seem like his plan was to just take the pot down right away. Weitzman played his hand totally fine. The Result: Weitzman finished fourth, taking home a payday worth $380,240. Voulgaris was able to outlast him by one spot, earning $434,560 for third place. It was also just one spot shy of Voulgaris’ career best, when he finished runner up in the 2005 WPT LA Poker Classic main event. Winston went on to win the tournament and secure the $1,575,280 first-place prize. The doctor-turned-poker-enthusiast made a deep run in that year’s WSOP main event, finishing 26th for $333,490, and also won a preliminary event at the Five Diamond World Poker Classic for another $230,365, but mostly abandoned the tournament circuit after 2010. ♠       .
สมัคร คาสิโน ออนไลน์ ดาฟาเบท คาสิโน มือถือ คาสิโน ฝาก ถอนไม่มีขั้นต่ำ คาสิโน เครดิตฟรี คาสิโน ฟรีเครดิต
I’ve got a problem
By admin | | 0 Comments |

Sorry for long post/vent in advance!Okay so for context, addiction is something I'm not a stranger to. It seems like a family trait that everyone has an addiction, mostly drugs or alcohol. But my mum loved gambling. The worst thing about it is, I got her into it when I was maybe 10.We played 'harmless' bingo games together on a holiday one time, im talking like pennies to play and win a Teddy bear. It was a nice time and a fond memory. But i was Internet savvy and when we got home I introduced her to the online kind as a way of playing together at home and have time between us, safe to say we did win with some beginners luck. It was fun for a while but as a kid I got quickly bored. I didn't realise however I laid the seeds for my mums own addiction.I only realise now with hindsight how vulnerable to the thrill of it she would have been. I still hate myself to this day for what I did. She lost a lot of money, we lost a lot of Christmases. Couldn't pay bills or buy food some weeks. She never quite forgave herself for all of this even to this day. I always blamed myself entirely and promised id never end up like that.Tonight I realised I already had a while back.Lockdowns and covid restrictions made me bored I guess. Bored enough to forget how damaging gambling had been and in fact how much pain it caused me in the past. I signed up to a bingo site, £20 isn't too harmful. I won a jackpot. Incredible I could finally pay off some debt I had over lockdown and I seriously couldn't stop thinking how lucky and thankful I was.My family congratulated me, jokingly said "be careful don't be silly, it's too easy to fall into it, don't chase money" and I confidently said nope, no, I know what I'm doing. Seen it before, I know I won't be like that. Not me, im so careful with money...Now I can't stop.I've restricted the account, but I keep making new ones on different sites. I always restrict them after I lose again, £10, £20, £50 here and there adds up. I never break even, which is rare. Even if i win i keep most of it in the account to play with. Might be on a roll...well its only £50 ill withdraw what I put in. Then just end up depositing it again.. and again, I can't keep up with the maths to even know how badly I'm losing anymore.I felt empty. I kept just depositing more expecting to feel something, like id accomplished anything. I just felt numb. I even started just playing stupid stakes to watch the money disappear? I just didn't feel a thing. Yet I can't stop. Even deposit limits don't matter when I'm waiting until midnight to add more. Its tonight that I realised I have a problem, its been buried for a while and I unlocked something in me that was dormant.So I've restricted, a lot. And ive found you all. I'm sorry for the venting for not much detail but I've already lost more than id of ever won. I've spent double what I was happy to have won the first time in the space of just the last week. Nevermind all the money I won and never withdrew, counting that I've probably lost triple.. I'm already lying to my partner about it. "Oh i have bonus money" "oh I had left over money from last time"Im getting snappy and irritable too, I zone out and stop replying to him when I'm playing. If he distracts me during a game I just cut him off and snap at him and I realised it today, and I actually feel sick at myself. He plays his own app game thats a strategy game so we sometimes don't talk much anyway. I tried justifying my spending as he puts in money to his game too, so now we both had a game. Ive never really played much games myself, until now.I felt enraged that he tried to speak to me. I realised how truly dangerous it become. I was almost angry at him for being around me and taking my focus away, but felt nothing if I won or lost on those games anyway.I'm just horrified by how quickly this settled in so I'm really hoping I can stop now before I ruin everything, not just financially.Im really hoping I can do better.
เกม คาสิโน ได้เงินจริง เกม คาสิโน ออนไลน์ คาสิโน ใหม่ ล่าสุด คาสิโน ออนไลน์ สล็อต เฮง เฮง คาสิโน
Illinois: selection process for Waukegan casino operator delayed
By admin | | 0 Comments |

Gaming Board ยังคงมองหาวาณิชธนกิจเพื่อประเมินผู้สมัครสามคน กระบวนการรับใบอนุญาตในการพัฒนาคาสิโนใน Waukegan ในปีหน้าล่าช้าไปหลายเดือนเนื่องจาก Illinois Gaming Board ยังคงมองหาวาณิชธนกิจเพื่อช่วยประเมินผู้สมัครทั้งสาม ก่อนที่คณะกรรมการจะให้ใบอนุญาตแก่คาสิโนซึ่งจะเป็นส่วนหนึ่งของศูนย์รวมความบันเทิงที่เป็นเจ้าของที่ดินขนาด 28 เอเคอร์ใกล้กับศูนย์การค้า Fountain Square จะต้องคงไว้ซึ่งบริการของวาณิชธนกิจเพื่อช่วยในการแข่งขันกระบวนการรายงาน ชิคาโกทริบูน แม้ว่าคณะกรรมการจะออกคำขออย่างเป็นทางการเพื่อเชิญการเสนอราคาจากวาณิชธนกิจเพื่อช่วยในการประเมินผลผู้จัดการ Marcus Frutcher กล่าวในการประชุมวันที่ 27 มกราคมว่าไม่มีการเสนอราคาใด ๆ ภายในวันที่ 8 มกราคมทำให้เกิดความล่าช้าในการออกใบอนุญาต Waukegan "น่าเสียดายที่เราไม่ได้รับการเสนอราคาใด ๆ ดังนั้นจึงไม่สามารถรักษา บริษัท วาณิชธนกิจเพื่อช่วยในกระบวนการนี้ได้" Frutcher กล่าวในที่ประชุม "รหัสการประกวดราคากำหนดขั้นตอนต่างๆที่เราต้องดำเนินการให้เสร็จสิ้นและเรากำลังดำเนินการให้เสร็จโดยเร็ว" เมื่อคณะกรรมการออก RFP ในเดือนธันวาคมคณะกรรมการได้ขอความช่วยเหลือจากวาณิชธนกิจและผู้เชี่ยวชาญอื่น ๆ เพื่อพิจารณาประเด็นต่างๆเช่นผลกระทบทางเศรษฐกิจของโครงการคาสิโนการสร้างงานที่มีศักยภาพและการคาดการณ์ทางการเงินโดยรวม ภายใต้กฎหมายปี 2019 ที่อนุญาตให้มีคาสิโนเพิ่มเติมในอิลลินอยส์วอคีแกนแดนวิลล์ร็อกฟอร์ดชานเมืองทางตอนใต้ของคุกเคาน์ตี้และเขตดาวน์สเตตวิลเลียมสันเคาน์ตี้จะได้รับหนึ่งแห่ง ผู้เข้าร่วมประมูลสามรายได้รับการอนุมัติในปี 2019 โดย Waukegan City Council ทำให้คณะกรรมการสามารถเลือกตั้งผู้อนุญาตได้ คาดว่าจะมีผู้ชนะในเดือนตุลาคม ฟรัทเชอร์กล่าวในการประชุมสภาเมื่อวันที่ 29 ต.ค. ว่าการตัดสินใจล่าช้าเนื่องจากทั้งการแพร่ระบาดของไวรัสโคโรนาและความต้องการวาณิชธนกิจ Joe Miller โฆษกของบอร์ดเกมกล่าวว่ามีตัวเลือกมากมายที่เปิดให้คณะกรรมการเลือกวาณิชธนกิจรวมถึงตำแหน่งของ RFP อื่น เขาไม่รู้ว่าจะเกิดขึ้นเมื่อใดเนื่องจากคณะกรรมการไม่ได้คาดเดาไทม์ไลน์ Frutcher กล่าวในเดือนตุลาคมว่าเมื่อได้รับเลือกเป็นวาณิชธนกิจแล้วคณะกรรมการน่าจะประกาศหมายเลขใบอนุญาตภายในหกเดือน มิลเลอร์กล่าวว่าเขาไม่รู้ว่าทำไมจึงไม่ได้รับการเสนอราคา Sam Cunningham นายกเทศมนตรีเมือง Waukegan กล่าวว่าเขารู้สึกผิดหวังกับความล่าช้าอีกครั้ง แต่หวังว่าการพัฒนาในที่สุดจะเป็นประโยชน์ทางเศรษฐกิจต่อเมืองและชุมชนอื่น ๆ ในภาคตะวันออกเฉียงเหนือของรัฐอิลลินอยส์ เขาเข้าใจถึงความจำเป็นในการตรวจสอบโดยผู้เชี่ยวชาญด้านการเงิน "พวกเขาต้องการให้แน่ใจว่าจำนวนผู้สมัครอยู่ในสนามเบสบอล" คันนิงแฮมกล่าว 'ฉันผิดหวัง แต่มองในแง่ดีเพราะมันกำลังจะเกิดขึ้น กรอบเวลาจะยาวขึ้น คันนิงแฮมกล่าวด้วยความล่าช้าล่าสุดเขาไม่คาดว่าการก่อสร้างจะเริ่มในไตรมาสที่สองหรือสามของปีหน้า ผู้สมัครสามคนสำหรับคาสิโน Waukegan ได้แก่ Full House Resorts, North Point Casino และ Midwest Gaming ในขณะที่ตัวแทนของ Midwest Gaming กล่าวว่า บริษัท ไม่มีความคิดเห็นเกี่ยวกับความล่าช้า แต่ผู้ได้รับอนุญาตรายอื่นยังคงตื่นเต้นกับโครงการนี้ ทั้ง North Point และ Full House ได้รับเงินทุนที่จำเป็นสำหรับโครงการนี้ตัวแทนกล่าว Bill Warner ซีอีโอของ Warner Gaming ซึ่งเป็นส่วนหนึ่งของกลุ่ม North Point กล่าวในอีเมลว่าเขาเคารพในความขยันขันแข็งของบอร์ดเกม แต่ยังคงตื่นเต้นกับการสร้างและดำเนินการคาสิโนใน Waukegan "North Point Casino ใช้เงินทุนเต็มจำนวนและพร้อมที่จะสร้างแหล่งบันเทิงในท้องถิ่นใน Waukegan แล้ว" เขาเขียน. "เราเชื่อว่า Waukegan คุ้มค่ากับการรอคอยและความมุ่งมั่นของเราที่มีต่อชุมชนจะไม่ลดลงเมื่อเวลาผ่านไป" Alex J.Stolyar รองประธานอาวุโสและประธานเจ้าหน้าที่ฝ่ายพัฒนาของ Full House Resorts, Inc. กล่าวว่า บริษัท ของเขายังมีการจัดหาเงินทุนอยู่และพร้อมที่จะดำเนินการต่อหาก Full House ได้รับใบอนุญาต “ เราตื่นเต้นกับการเริ่มต้น” เขากล่าว "เราใช้เงินทุนอย่างเต็มที่และพร้อมที่จะก้าวไปข้างหน้าโดยเร็วที่สุด" Stolyar กล่าวว่าเมื่อออกใบอนุญาตแล้ว Full House มีแผนที่จะเปิดคาสิโนชั่วคราวบนเว็บไซต์ภายในหกเดือน เขาคาดว่าการก่อสร้างจะเริ่มในไม่ช้าพร้อมกับการดำเนินการถาวรและจะแล้วเสร็จในอีกสองปี ,
ปอยเปต คาสิโน เกมส์ยิ่งปลา คาสิโน ได้เงินจริงไหม เล่น คาสิโน คาสิโน191 คาสิโน 88
1 2 3 118